Junking Hardware / Cleaning Office

I'm clearing out about 90% of my old hardware from my home office.

Things like my ancient Sun Sparc Station 4 and 5 for my old Oracle work, and the older Sparc Classic (lunchbox), Sparc IPX systems used in my distributed web development days, and the Cobalt RaQ and iMac G3 systems I did development on about a decade ago.  I'm also dumping a Compaq 286 laptop that served me well in doing assembly and C coding and it's cousin the 486 that was my constant companion for several years. The dumping continues with numerous boxes of old cabling, strange and exotic old cards (ISA, PCI, MCA, EISA, VESA, Sbus, and some I don't even recognize now), a couple of engineering sample video cards, some really old KVMs, couple of 24 port serial port concentrators (that I hacked the firmware on) and even a pair of old Cisco 2500's used in my network testing days. It's about 20 years of hardware exiting the house before we do the renovations and addition to my home.

It is really sad to see some of these little guys leave the house but looking forward to a cleaned out home office that I can get back to being a pleasant work and coding environment.  So out the door they go.

In dumping all this equipment, I've been gathering the hardware junk box that I can re-use in other hardware projects.  So far I have two of these boxes with weird stuff like an old Palm 5 docking station, some ear phones, some older coaxial cable, and the other random assortment of hardware junk you find useful when hacking hardware. These two boxes are starting too look really strange like something from a Mad Max movie.

This is cathartic writing about all these old pieces of equipment that were used in my professional and personal learning processes. It's hard to part with some of these because of the happy memories associated with figuring out the next *big* problem in technology for that time.

Good bye little friends and now to start gathering the next set. :)

UPS and Print Server

I  bought a APC Back-UPS ES 550 awhile back from CostCo without knowing for sure if it would work with the Seagate BlackArmor NAS. It works great so far. I was afraid I would have to hack on the configuration file for the software but it worked out of the box without any extra effort other than enabling the UPS Manager.

I had a second dilemma which was that I use the NAS as my print server for an older Brother MFC 7420 printer and did not want to loose that configuration.  There is only one USB port off the back of the unit that is supposed to work with printers and UPS.  So for my next surprise, I found that it works for both the UPS and printer with an old un-powered notebook USB hub that I got as a door prize at some Cisco event.

I may test plugging up my old 500GB Seagate USB hard disk to that hub as well and see if it recognizes the space and makes it available.

So for anyone else, I cannot vouch for all UPS and printers but my configuration above is working great.

Serial Port on BlackArmor NAS

I found my old Samsung x426 USB cell phone programmer cable as I was cleaning out my home office. I might have mentioned this cable earlier when I wrote about adding a serial console to the BlackArmor NAS.  The cable is a really old style one that has a weird connector for the cell phone way before the mini-USB became standard. The interesting thing about this cable is that it has a serial to USB converter chip (2303HXC 0546) that does the magic of converting serial to USB. That is why that thing was ridiculously expensive ($35) when I bought it back in the day.

Why this is even on my radar as possible is that the website CrapNAS had an entry for how to connect a serial or USB cable so you can watch the Linux boot up as a serial console session. They specify two different ways to do this. For the serial connection, they specify a MAX3232 as necessary.  The USB connection has a schematic that includes a 2303HX. I'm not sure what the difference is between that and my 2303HXC so I will be doing some reading before I cut into the cable and get out the soldering iron.

Why am I even messing around with a serial console?  Because as I am planning to mess around with the lower level system, I should have a back out plan if I do something wrong. A serial console on the device gives me more options during the boot up even if I cannot connect via a network connection.

As far as getting time to work on the compiler toolchain, I've been relaxing over the holiday break with family, cleaning my messy home office and have not even booted up the virtual machine since my last post. I intend to get back to it someday.

Seagate Black Armor NAS

Yeah it's been hectic at work and lots to do in domestic life as well so this hobby project hasn't gotten much attention. Christmas break is coming however and I'm planning on getting some time to work on it. I think most Open Source projects or hobbies get a boost over the holidays.

Merry Xmas & Happy New Year in case I don't get back here before the holidays.

Newlib error during compile

Earlier I was working on the problem with compiling using the arm-elf-gcc on very basic programs.  After some work, I found the base problem is that the libc replacement from newlib are not being picked up at compile time and properly using the syscalls mechanism. Hardwired hacks to work around it produced an executable but something is still wrong with how the compiler was built.

I've distilled the error down to a single search.

Google Search: "/lib/libc.a(lib_a-exit.o): In function `exit':" "newlib/libc/stdlib/exit.c:65: undefined reference to `_exit'"

Several other people appear to have run into the same problem, so I'll be reading up on the problem and see what solutions exist.

Compilation failures

The problem is that I can get an ARM executable but not sure why the default system is not working to produce a basic HelloWorld.

$ cat test.c
int main (){return 0;}

$ arm-elf-gcc test.c -o test

...
/home/mcgarrah/DevelToolbin/binaries/arm-4.4.6/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-elf/4.4.6/../../../../arm-elf/lib/libc.a(lib_a-exit.o): In function `exit':
exit.c:(.text+0x54): undefined reference to `_exit'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

$ arm-elf-gcc test.c -o test -v

This spews a couple of pages of additional output which points me to something called the "Using built-in specs" and lots of directory path information for various things like include files and libraries. These all look about right. A directory /DevelToolbin/binaries/arm-4.4.6/arm-elf/lib has some interesting lib files in it.

$ arm-elf-gcc test.c -o test ~/DevelToolbin/binaries/arm-4.4.6/arm-elf/lib/redboot-syscalls.o

$ file test

test: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1, statically linked, not stripped

When you are facing a missing library like the above issue, you typically just have to find the right library and add it to your build.  In this case we are missing something so fundamental that we need to figure out why it is broken or will hit future issues.

While finding the above syscall libraries, I noticed some files called specs files which are:

• linux.specs
• rdimon.specs
• rdpmon.specs
• redboot.specs

RDP, RDI, RedBoot and Linux are all syscall (system call) protocols. A syscall protocol describes how a libc (standard C library) communicates with the operating system kernel. For our case this library is newlib which uses another syscall protocol called libgloss as an interface between libc and the above syscall protocols.  I'm not sure which protocols are the default but something is not right about this combination.

$ arm-elf-gcc -dumpspecs

This dumps even more output that is even more cryptic but looks important when taken with the above information. There are built-in defaults for GCC that are being overridden by these specs files.

There is an options to change the specs entries from the GCC command line which I use to identify what is happening.

$ arm-elf-gcc test.c -o test -specs=redboot.specs

$ arm-elf-gcc test.c -o test -specs=pid.specs

$ arm-elf-gcc test.c -o test -specs=linux.specs

The pids and redboot files are a very minor difference in a setting so are essentially the same.  Linux is significantly different as a system call interface.

$ arm-elf-gcc test.c -o test -specs=rdimon.specs

$ arm-elf-gcc test.c -o test -specs=rdpmon.specs

Both the RDI and RDP return basically the same error as the above missing library.  So we have identified what is probably the default libraries used by libgloss.

This is just a journey down the rabbit hole. So I need to revisit the newlib build process and see what I did wrong in it.

Update December 4th, 2011 7:30pm: What you see above happens in both the gcc 4.4.6 and gcc 4.3.2 compiled software sets. Same exact problem for both versions of gcc and associated other libraries. I did a full rebuild of the 4.3.2 and did some tracing of the path built into gcc and re-verified paths to all libraries. Same issue still happens. So we have a genuine problem in the build process that is impacting the compiler.  Could be in any place across the binutils, newlib or gcc compilations. So I'll be digging into each. The nice part is it looks like a common problem so if I fix it in the 4.3.2 series then it will probably fix in the 4.4.6 series as well.

Toolchains compiled

Two full toolchains built and a third that I still think might be made to work.  The first is using older versions of everything and was mostly done as a test to get the build environment working against known sources that are known to build. Even this known build process required some effort to get working in a current OS environment. Those docs, notes and scripts will be coming in the near future.

So to outline what works and not, I give you the following.

Toolchain that comes from older versions of software and the docs from Tom Walsh:

• binutils-2.19.1a.tar.bz2
• gcc-4.3.2.tar.bz2 (with a patch from Tom)
• newlib-1.16.0.tar.gz (with a patch from Tom)
• insight-weekly-CVS-7.0.50-20091130.tar.bz2

Newest versions that compiled based on Tom's scripts:

• binutils-2.22.tar.bz2
• gcc-4.4.6.tar.bz2
• newlib-1.19.0.tar.gz
• insight-CVS-20111130.tar.bz2 (pulled from CVS head and required patching by me)

Newest versions that fails to compile in GCC in zlib:

• binutils-2.22.tar.bz2
• gcc-4.6.2.tar.bz2
• newlib-1.19.0.tar.gz
• insight-CVS-20111130.tar.bz2 (pulled from CVS head and required patching by me)

The issue in GCC is well documented (if you know what you are looking for) as a bug in the "--enabled-multilib" during the build. The zlib library that is packaged with the GCC source fails to build in a cross-compiled configuration. Who knew that GCC packages their own copy of zlib in the GCC sources? There appear to be a couple of solutions which might fix the problem. The first is to just use the native zlib from the host system and pass in "--with-system-zlib" but that feels like a hack instead of a fix. The other is to revert a change in GCC that is documented in a couple of places (Bug45174 and Bug43328). This is a bug in the "configure" phase of the standard "configure;make;make install" but shows up in the "make" stage. So, I'll revisit this as time permits and see about getting the latest GCC 4.6 series working.

The more exciting thing is that it looks like both GCC versions that compiled will compile code to an intermediate state.  That is not proof that it generates a working executable but it is a step in the right direction.

For the GCC 4.3.2 version here is a test showing it compiling a quick test.

$ cat > test.c

int main (){return 0;}

Ctrl-D

$ ./arm-elf-gcc -Os -S test.c

$ cat test.s

        .file   "test.c"

        .text

        .align  2

        .global main

        .type   main, %function

main:

        @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0

        @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0

        @ link register save eliminated.

        mov     r0, #0

        bx      lr

        .size   main, .-main

        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 4.3.2"

For the GCC 4.4.6 version here is a test showing it compiling a quick test.

$ cat > test.c

int main (){return 0;}

Ctrl-D

$ ./arm-elf-gcc -Os -S test.c

$ cat test.s

        .file   "test.c"

        .text

        .align  2

        .global main

        .type   main, %function

main:

        @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0

        @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0

        @ link register save eliminated.

        mov     r0, #0

        bx      lr

        .size   main, .-main

        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 4.4.6"

While this is good news, it is not an ARM executable. My followup post will not be so upbeat.